Once again the Times is trying to grab us and warn us about faulty election law and bills.
Any change to election law that does not include mandatory, statistically valid audits is worse than doing nothing. Or a new approach proposed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) would do the same: provide for multiple yet independent methods to count and recount the ballots. Do both and let's begin to protect our precious right to select our leaders by the will of the people. A new bill without audits or what NIST calls “Software Independence” would give false security and would be worse than doing nothing.
The Times previously reported that paper trails from touch screen machines were unusable as much as ten percent of the time. As the Times has pointed out in several articles, including a detailed report in the Magazine in January by Clive Thompson, hand-marked paper ballots have been proven to be “hackable” as well. This is not made up. This is real.
We try to alert Americans in an entertaining fictional account, Cassandra, Chanting. People who would do us ill have reason to subvert our electoral process. Cassandra has been chanting for quite some time. Thanks again to the Times for adding to this Greek chorus (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/opinion/03sun2.html).
"I could think of no worse...than [if] the presidency itself could be stolen.…" Thomas Jefferson.
---
Cassandra, Chanting is for election process comments only. Please do not post any candidate-related comments.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
I read your e-mail about this NY Times article. Thank you for continuing to comment on these problems.
Post a Comment